TheFamily24

I have two comparisons for this thread.. who do you think is better Troy Smith and Ginn or Henne and Manningham? I'm going to say Henne and Mannigham because IMO henne is a better smarter, stay in the pocket quarterback than Smith. I look at Henne as Tom Brady and Smith as Michael Vick. I would say that Mannigham is better than Ginn just because he's stronger. He may not be as quick but he's a better reciever than Ginn IMO. I think Ginn is more so a reciever that's just going to blow past you with his speed. Manningham can muscle you out of the way, etc. He's not just a sprinter.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

KirkHinrich12

BUCKEYES!!!!!!! :beerbang2: :beerbang2: :beerbang2: :beerbang2: :beerbang2: :beerbang2: :beerbang2: :beerbang2:

Smith2Ginnfor6 all year long, baby. 34 days until the game!!!

TheFamily24

No reason? Or are you just being a homer? (again)

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

KirkHinrich12

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(TheFamily24 @ Oct 18 2006, 07:35 PM) [snapback]28905[/snapback]</div>No. The Buckeyes have the best damn offense in the country.

Ed the Ceo

OSU, but thats becouse the Enemy of my Enemy is my friend.

GO BLOW

TheFamily24

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(KirkHinrich12 @ Oct 19 2006, 11:37 PM) [snapback]29046[/snapback]</div>Yea, it looks that way so far. It's ok when them and Michigan meet up with 0 losses each the BIG BLUE will shutup Troy Smith and the Fuckeyes' offense up.


GO BLUE!

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Dezmatic247

OSU will have to be 1-dimensional against Michigan because Antonio Pittman will not run free against Michigan's defense like he does with other mediocre teams. That will leave all the pressure on the OSU passing game and Leon Hall will make it tough for Anthony Gonzalez all day long. The corners are faster this year and will play Ginn deep!

__________________
*Note* This is not me, I am equipped with male parts

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

KirkHinrich12

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(D.H.P.F.S.88 @ Oct 20 2006, 03:30 PM) [snapback]29088[/snapback]</div>and then ginn can beat them underneath, and use his blazing speed

TheFamily24

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(KirkHinrich12 @ Oct 20 2006, 10:24 PM) [snapback]29130[/snapback]</div>IMO Michigan is just the better team this year. The Fuckeyes are looking pretty one dimensional unlike Michigan having every element on both sides of the ball. The Fuckeyes won't be able to control the BIG BLUE come gameday and they probably shouted for joy when they heard Manningham had surgery. This is horrible for Michigan because he probably won't be back either a week before the game or the week of but at the same time it helps then IMO because it's showing them how to play without always relying on him. Ohio State won't be ready for Michigan come day you watch and see.


GO BLUE!

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

MoNeY_MiKe__

First of all..you're comparing Troy Smith to Michael Vick, why? I don't know. Smith does not run like Vick does. He only averages 12 rushing yards per game, has no rushing touchdowns, and only runs when it's his only option. Then you call Henne Tom Brady, I can't comment on that because I know nothing about Henne.

Manningham a better WR than Ginn, I'll give you that simply because Ginn didn't even start off as a WR, he was a DB who was converted because of his speed. Now if you was comparing Manningham and Gonzalez we'd have an even debate because Gonzalez is actually the best WR on Ohio State regardless what the media thinks. As individuals Manningham is a better WR but if you want a combination of WR's Ohio State is much better.

Thennnnnnnn you said their offense is one dimensional, have to argue with that too. When your best players are your WR's and QB of course you're going to pass more and yeah at times vs the great teams Pittman doesn't show up vs Texas he had 74 yards, vs Penn State 110, vs Iowa 122. Yeah he doesn't show up, maybe it's just me. I may sound like a homer but Ohio State doesn't have any noticable flaws right now.

Last and certainly least...I'll give Michigan their props. I didn't expect them to be doing so good right now, but not having Manningham last week showed how much they relied on him as being a deep threat and spreading out the defense. Don't trip over Iowa looking down the road to the game vs Ohio State.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Ohio State Buckeyes Fan Since 1996


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Sacramento Kings GM

Mike Bibby - PG
Rajon Rondo - SG
Brad Miller - C
Jermaine O'Neal - PF
Willie Green - SF

TheFamily24

I wouldn't go too far. I mean it's pretty reasonable to say that Ohio State's recieving core is better but I wouldn't say MUCH better. Don't get ahead of yourself. Manningham is a better reciever than Ginn, then you have Arrington against Gonzales. Gonzales is faster but with the recievers Arrington has next to him he fits in perfect. He has Manningham as that deap threat as well as Ecker and Breaston so he's the type of reciever that can play big at about a 3rd and 5 position and run that slant route for you because he's not really that fast. So IMO I would say Michigan has the better recieving core because when you start to compare the receivers there is only 2 guys that come in to mind for OSU while on the other hand Michigan has so many other options. Breaston, Manningham, Ecker, Arrington, and don't forget Matthews. Michigan has a lot more weapons than OSU and most of them are better.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

King of da court

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(TheFamily24 @ Oct 20 2006, 04:12 PM) [snapback]29084[/snapback]</div>LMAO

__________________
:beerbang2: :beerbang2: :beerbang2: :beerbang2: :beerbang2: :beerbang2: :beerbang2: :beerbang2: :beerbang2: :beerbang2: :beerbang2: :beerbang2: :beerbang2: :beerbang2: :beerbang2: :beerbang2: :beerbang2: :beerbang2: :beerbang2: :beerbang2: :beerbang2: :beerbang2: :beerbang2: :beerbang2: :flipa: :flipa: :flipa: :flipa: :flipa: :flipa: :flipa: :flipa: :flipa: :flipa: :flipa: :flipa: :flipa: :flipa: :flipa: :flipa: :nuttkick: :nuttkick: :nuttkick: :nuttkick: :nuttkick:

KirkHinrich12

The Buckeyes are going to kick Michigan's ass.

Yugioffmahproperty

I'm a Wolverine fan.

But OSU looks tougher and better.

U of M's weakness is Henne. He's not as good as Quinn, Stanton or Smith.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

TheFamily24

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Yugioffmahproperty @ Oct 22 2006, 01:49 PM) [snapback]29254[/snapback]</div>
He's not as good you're right... HE'S BETTER. Right now the only person that's probably arguably better than Henne is John David Booty and Smith. How can you say he's not better than Stanton?!?!?!?! Stanton isn't that good of a quarterback at all he runs around like a chicken with his head cut off. Then we saw the performance Quinn had against Michigan. Don't talk to me about Quinn or Stanton being better than Henne because that's just ridiculous. Quinn choked against us and GT and you're saying he's better than Henne?! They were talking about him being the heisman winner, #1 pick all that. After that Michigan game all the analyst jumped off his dick. The top 3 quarterbacks in college football IMO is John David Booty, Smith, and Henne. And I think Henne is the best out of all of them. It's arguable, but I don't see how you even put Quinn let alone STANTON in the same conversation about Henne at all.

__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.